Can Fruit Really Rot in Your Stomach? The Truth About the Food Combining Theory.

by Leigh Ann Otte, managing editor

Just around the corner loom … dum, dum, duuuuum … New Year’s resolutions! Let the dieting begin!

This week, we focus on one type of diet that has not only your waist size but your entire physical health in mind: the food combining theory.

Ever heard that fruit should only be eaten on an empty stomach? That comes from this theory, which has been around for more than a century. It says certain foods eaten in certain combinations are harmful and can even make you gain weight. Thus, food combining diet plans are readily available.

Experts outside the alternative medicine arena have long insisted the theory is hogwash. Registered dietitian Jill Weisenberger agrees. Here, she explains why–but also lists combinations that have been proven healthful, some of which go against this theory.

What do you think?

Get articles, tips and more: sign up for the My Family Doctor e-newsletter here.

Related Posts

Tags:

Related Posts

4 Responses to “Can Fruit Really Rot in Your Stomach? The Truth About the Food Combining Theory.”

  1. Balanced Diet « ∞ itis Says:

    [...] There’s a new post up over at My Family Doctor which includes this [...]

  2. Judy Rodman Says:

    Well, all I can say is that in my personal experience, I can eat fruit only by itself. If I eat it with other food, it turns into diarrhea.

    It’s interesting that some things which are said to simply be ‘proven to be true by science’ turn out to be… a little more complicated. Maybe this is a case where the answer depends on the condition and absorption/assimilation power of the individual’s digestive system. I have been diagnosed with Crohns’ Disease, and have a digestive system which is quite inefficient. Maybe food combining has a greater immediate effect on someone like me, while for someone else it would be so easy for that particular body to accomplish that the added digestive effort is not noticable. What do you guys think about that?

  3. Mark Salinas Says:

    I am not convinced but it is an interesting theory. I am going to look into it further…good one!

  4. Marco Says:

    According to the writing, Adam and Eve were the first humans created by God, who lived approximately 6,000 years ago. According to the science, humans existed a long time before. The two lines of thought can be easily united, thanks to the omnipotence of God, who in the beginning created humans in a reality where there was no concept of “evil”. Metaphorically speaking, Adam and Eve were expelled from this heavenly reality, find himself in another reality, namely in today’s reality that we all know, where there is the concept of evil, as well as that of the well; not necessarily a reality where they were the first humans, but the first who experienced firsthand the life God had reserved for them (so they were the first humans in the “perfect” reality). From here it is clear that the story of Adam and Eve does not upset in the least bit the evolutionary linearity. In practice, they were the first men of God; whereas prehistoric man lived before Adam and Eve was a man, but it could be considered as an animal evolved from apes or created by something else, which had two arms and two legs, and that may have hybridated with the descendants of Adam And Eve after they were “moved away” from the “perfect reality”. God has endowed man about the concept of “infinity” and “eternity”, as well as other questions can not be explained through the use of the scientific method, thus making humans free to believe in God or not, in a reality for us tricky and necessary for the construction and continuation of his project.

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge
© My Family Doctor 2010.
Magazine Web Design - M Digital Design Solutions for Publishers